Quantum Mechanics

Table of Contents

1. Formalism

1.1. Hilbert Space

Set of all possible quantum states \(\ket{\psi}\) is postulated to form a Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}\).

The state space \(\mathcal{H}\) of many-aspect system is the tensor product of the state spaces of each aspect \(\mathcal{H}_i\). \[ \mathcal{H} = \bigotimes_i\mathcal{H}_i. \]

1.2. Operator

It is postulated that for every observable \(Q\) there exists hermitian operator \(\hat{Q}\) such that: \[ \ev{Q} = \mel{\psi}{\hat{Q}}{\psi}. \] furthermore, for eigenstates \(\ket{Q_i}\), \[ Q_i\ket{Q_i} = \hat{Q} \ket{Q_i}. \]

1.2.1. Momentum Operator

Momentum operator \(\hat{\mathbf{p}}\) is the generator of translation \(\hat{U}(\mathbf{x})\): \[ \hat{U}(\mathbf{x}) = e^{-i\hat{\mathbf{p}}\vdot \mathbf{x}/\hbar}. \]

\begin{align*} \grad \hat{U}(\mathbf{x})\ket{\mathbf{x}} &= \left( \frac{\hat{U}(\dd{\mathbf{x}}) - \hat{U}(\mathbf{0})}{\dd{\mathbf{x}}} \right)\ket{\mathbf{x}} \\ &= \frac{\ket{\mathbf{x} + \dd{\mathbf{x}}} - \ket{\mathbf{x}}}{\dd{\mathbf{x}}} \\ &= \pdv{\mathbf{x}} \ket{\mathbf{x}} \\ &= \frac{1}{i\hbar} \hat{\mathbf{p}} \ket{\mathbf{x}}. \end{align*}

The position basis form of momentum operator is derived as follows:

\begin{align*} \mel{\mathbf{x}}{\hat{\mathbf{p}}}{\psi} &= \bra{\mathbf{x}} \int_{\Omega} \dd[3]{\mathbf{x}'} \psi(\mathbf{x}')\hat{\mathbf{p}}\ket{\mathbf{x}'} \\ &= \bra{\mathbf{x}} \int_{\Omega} \dd[3]{\mathbf{x}'} \psi(\mathbf{x}')i\hbar \pdv{\mathbf{x}'}\ket{\mathbf{x}'} \\ &= \bra{\mathbf{x}} \int_{\Omega} \dd[3]{\mathbf{x}'}i\hbar \pdv{\mathbf{x}'}\left( \psi(\mathbf{x}')\ket{\mathbf{x}'} \right) + \bra{\mathbf{x}} \int_{\Omega} \dd[3]{\mathbf{x}'} \left( - i\hbar \pdv{\mathbf{x}'}\psi(\mathbf{x}') \right)\ket{\mathbf{x}'}\\ &= \bra{\mathbf{x}}\oint_{\partial \Omega}\dd[2]{\mathbf{x}'}i\hbar \psi(\mathbf{x}')\ket{\mathbf{x}'} + \bra{\mathbf{x}} \int_{\Omega} \dd[3]{\mathbf{x}'} \left( - i\hbar \pdv{\mathbf{x}'}\psi(\mathbf{x}') \right)\ket{\mathbf{x}'} \\ &= \bra{\mathbf{x}} \int_{\Omega} \dd[3]{\mathbf{x}'} \left( - i\hbar \pdv{\mathbf{x}'}\psi(\mathbf{x}') \right)\ket{\mathbf{x}'} \\ &= \int_{\Omega} \dd[3]{\mathbf{x}'} \left( - i\hbar \pdv{\mathbf{x}'}\psi(\mathbf{x}') \right)\delta^3(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{x}') \\ &= -i\hbar \pdv{\mathbf{x}} \psi(\mathbf{x}) \end{align*}

where the wave function \(\psi(\mathbf{x})\) is assumed to be localized and the boundary term vanishes.

1.2.2. Lie Theory

The unitary operators \(\hat{U}\) form a Lie group, and the Hermitian operators \(\hat{H}\) are related to the Lie algebra that generate that Lie group by the exponential map: \[ \exp\colon \frac{1}{i\hbar}\hat{H} \mapsto \hat{U}. \]

Hermitian operator of an observable \(p\) maps to transformation in its conjugate variable \(q\). The justification comes from the quantum equivalent of Hamilton's equations:

\begin{align*} &\pdv{q}\ev{H} = - \dv{t} \ev{p} \\ \implies &\pdv{\bra{\psi}}{q} \hat{H}\ket{\psi} + \bra{\psi} \pdv{\hat{H}}{q}\ket{\psi} + \bra{\psi}\hat{H} \pdv{\ket{\psi}}{q}= - \left(\dv{\bra{\psi}}{t} \hat{p}\ket{\psi} + \bra{\psi} \dv{\hat{p}}{t}\ket{\psi} + \bra{\psi}\hat{p} \dv{\ket{\psi}}{t}\right). \end{align*}

Let us assume that the Hamiltonian operator does not explicitly depend on \(q\) (not \(\hat{q}\)), and canonical momentum operator \(\hat{p}\) does not explicitly depend on time. Using Schrödinger Equation, the equation becomes:

\begin{align*} \pdv{\bra{\psi}}{q} \hat{H}\ket{\psi} + &\bra{\psi}\hat{H} \pdv{\ket{\psi}}{q} \\ = \mel{\psi}{-\frac{1}{i\hbar}\hat{p}\hat{H}}{\psi} + &\mel{\psi}{\hat{H}\frac{1}{i\hbar}\hat{p}}{\psi}. \end{align*}

This strongly suggests the following identity \[ i\hbar \pdv{q} \ket{\psi} = \hat{p} \ket{\psi} \] and consequently the generator relation: \[ \hat{U}(q) = \exp(\frac{\hat{p} q}{i\hbar}). \] where \(\hat{U}(q)\) is the translation operator in the general coordinate \(q\) by \(q\) amount.

Similar argument can be made for the second Hamilton equation. From \[ \pdv{p}\ev{H} = \dv{t}\ev{q}, \] we get: \[ -i\hbar \pdv{p}\ket{\psi} = \hat{q}\ket{\psi} \] and \[ \hat{U}(p) = \exp(-\frac{\hat{q}p}{i\hbar}) \]

1.3. Canonical Commutation Relation

\[ \frac{1}{i\hbar}[\hat{\mathbf{x}}, \hat{\mathbf{p}}] = \mathbf{1}. \]

It is easy to show from the assumption that momentum is the generator of spatial translation: \[ \ev{\left[\hat{\mathbf{x}}, \frac{1}{i\hbar}\hat{\mathbf{p}}\right]} = \pdv{\ev{x}}{x} = 1. \]

1.4. Uncertainty Relation

  • Uncertainty Principle

This answers why the electron doesn't fall to the nucleus. Quantum particles cannot be localized, because of quantum fuzziness. By uncertainty principle, if a particle happens to be localized, then it would have very high momentum for the particle to fly away.

2. Schrödinger Equation

Quantum equivalent of Hamilton's equations.

The basis-independent equation is given by: \[ i\hbar \pdv{t} \ket{\psi} = \hat{H}|\psi\rangle \] where \(\hat{H}\) is the hamiltonian operator, and \(\ket{\psi}\) is the state vector.

The solution to this equation can be given simply as: \[ \ket{\psi(t)} = e^{-i\hat{H}t/\hbar} \ket{\psi_0}. \]

2.1. Basis-dependent Equations

Position-basis Equation \[ i\hbar \pdv{t}\psi(\mathbf{x}) = \mel{\mathbf{x}}{\hat{H}}{\psi} \]

For a simple Hamiltonian of the form \(H = T + V\), \[ i\hbar \pdv{t}\psi(\mathbf{x}) = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\laplacian\psi(\mathbf{x}) + V(\mathbf{x})\psi(\mathbf{x}) \]

Momentum-basis Equation \[ i\hbar \pdv{t}\phi(p) = \mel{p}{\hat{H}}{\psi} \]

For simple Hamiltonian of the form \(H = T + V\), \[ i\hbar \pdv{t} \phi(p) = \frac{p^2}{2m}\phi(p) + V \left( i\hbar \pdv{p} \right)\phi(p). \]

Energy-basis Equation \[ i\hbar \pdv{t}c(E) = \mel{E}{\hat{H}}{\psi} \]

For simple Hamiltonian of the form \(H = T + V\), \[ i\hbar \pdv{t} c(E) = E c(E). \]

2.2. Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation

When \(\psi\) is of the form \(\psi(\mathbf{x})e^{-iEt/\hbar}\) , we have \[ \hat{H}\psi = E\psi \] where \(\psi(\mathbf{x})e^{-iEt/\hbar}\) is called the energy eigenstate.

2.3. For Hydrogen Atom

The potential energy operator is given by the electrostatic potential energy: \[ \hat{V} = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0\hat{r}}. \]

The solution can be obtained using the separation of variable technique in spherical coordinates: \[ \psi=R_{n,l}(r)Y_l^m(\theta, \phi)e^{-iEt/\hbar} \] where \(R_{n,l}(r)\) is radial function, \(Y_l^m(\theta, \phi)\) is sperical harmonics.

2.3.1. Radial Function

  • Starts positive at \(r=0\) , flips sign \(n-l-1\) times.
  • flattens as \(n\) gets large.

2.3.2. Sperical Harmonics

  • basis function for all sperical functions.
  • smooth at every points.
  • it is the orbitals in chemistry when the real part of the function is taken.
  • it flips its phase \(l-|m|\) times, when going from north pole to the south.
  • it rotates in phase \(m\) times, as circling along the azimuthal plane.

3. Heisenberg Picture

The state vector does not change, but the operator itself changes over time.

3.1. Heisenberg's Equation

  • Heisenberg Equation of Motion

\[ \dv{t} A_{\rm H}(t) = \frac{1}{i\hbar} [A_{\rm H}(t), H_{\rm H}(t)] + \left( \dv{A_{\rm S}}{t} \right)_{\rm H} \] where \(A_{\rm S}\) is the operator in Schrödinger picture, and subscript \(\rm H\) makes it into an operator in Heisenberg picture again.

Partial derivative notation is usually prefered for \(A_{\rm S}\) to emphasize the derivative is taken with respect to the explicit dependence on time of the operator. However, from mathematical point of view there is no reason to use it. I find it more confusing to use partial derivative, and I chose to stick to the mathematical convention.

4. Density Matrix

It can contain both quantum and statistical uncertainties For pure state \(\ket{\psi}\):

  • \[ \rho = \ket{\psi}\bra{\psi} \]
  • idempotent: \(\rho = \rho^2\)
  • purity of one: \(\tr \rho^2 = 1\)

For mixed state:

  • \[ \rho = \sum_j p_j \ket{\psi_j}\bra{\psi_j}\]

The expectation value can be calculated: \[ \expval{A} = \tr(\rho A). \]

4.1. Von Neumann Equation

  • Liouville-von Neumann equation

\[ i\hbar \dv{t}\rho = [H, \rho]. \]

5. Spinor

5.1. Pauli Spin Matrices

5.1.1. Definition

\begin{align*} \sigma_1 = \sigma_x = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \\ \sigma_2 = \sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix} \\ \sigma_3 = \sigma_z = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} \\ \end{align*}

Sometimes the identity matrix is included as \(\sigma_0\).

5.1.2. Properties

  • Hermitian, Involutory, Unitary.
  • They, together with the identity matrix \(I = \sigma_0\), form the basis for the real vector space of \(2\times 2\) Hermitian matrices.
  • Anti-Commutativity under Multiplication.
  • It is the linear map (order 3 tensor) from the three dimensional vector space \(V\) to the spinor-pair space \(S\otimes S^*\):
    • \[ \sigma_i\vphantom{\sigma}^{a}\vphantom{\sigma}_b \]
    • where \(a\) is the index for the spinor space \(S\) and \(b\) is the index for the dual spinor space \(S^*\).
  • It is with respect to the standard spinor basis.

5.1.3. Interpretation

  • It represents the interaction between the spin of a particle with an external electromagnetic field, which is best represented in the
    • \(\sigma s = s'\)
  • It also represents the observables which are the Hermitian matrices.
    • \(\langle s | \sigma | s \rangle\)
  • It is equivalent to the three basis vector of the Clifford Algebra \(\mathrm{Cl}_{3,0}(\mathbb{R})\).

5.1.4. Infeld-Van der Waerden Symbols

\[ \sigma_\mu^{a\dot{b}} \]

  • Generalization of the Pauli matrices to the four dimensional spacetime.
  • Using the 5.5.3.1.

5.2. Pauli Vector

  • Vectors with the basis of

\[ \begin{bmatrix}x\\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix} \rightsquigarrow \begin{bmatrix} z & x - yi \\ x+ yi & -z \end{bmatrix} = x\sigma_x + y\sigma_y + z\sigma_z \]

It is mostly equivalent to the three dimensional geometric algebra, with the exception that it admits s, since the components can be complex numbers.

5.2.1. Conjugation

  • Conjugation rotates \(\pi\) radians around the axis:

    \begin{align*} \sigma_x &\rightsquigarrow \sigma_z\sigma_x\sigma_z^{-1} = \sigma_z\sigma_x\sigma_z = -\sigma_z\sigma_z\sigma_x = -\sigma_x \\ \sigma_y &\rightsquigarrow \sigma_z\sigma_y\sigma_z^{-1} = \sigma_z\sigma_y\sigma_z = -\sigma_z\sigma_z\sigma_y = -\sigma_y \\ \sigma_z &\rightsquigarrow \sigma_z\sigma_z\sigma_z^{-1} = \sigma_z\sigma_z\sigma_z = +\sigma_z \end{align*}
  • And negative conjugation by \(\sigma_z\) reflects along the \(z\) axis.

5.2.2. Reflection and Rotation

  • Two reflections is a rotation.
  • Pauli vectors are reflected by the Pauli matrices by the conjugation.
  • And rotated by the two pairs of unit Pauli vectors, which are the members of the \(\mathrm{SU}(2)\) group.
  • Using some abstract algebra, the \(\mathrm{SU}(2)\) matrices are all the matrix the rotates a Pauli vector, (up to a complex multiple, which does not matter what that is so the determinant is just taken to be 1).

5.2.3. Properties

  • Traceless Hermitian Matrix
  • It squares to the square magnitude of the vector.
  • The determinant is the negative of the square magnitude.
  • The sum of pairs of sigma matrices are equivalent to the quaternion.
  • Both the group of unit quaternions and \(\mathrm{SU}(2)\) are isomorphic to the \(\mathrm{Spin}(3)\) Group, describing the spin in three dimensional space, which is the double cover of rotation group \(\mathrm{SO}(3)\).

5.3. Pauli Spinor

  • See ,
  • The factorization of the Pauli vectors into column and row spinors.
  • "Square root of a Vector"
    • A vector is linearly mapped to a Pauli vector which then can be factored.
    • It multiplys to form a rank 1 tensor, hence it is a rank ½ tensor.
  • The direct factorization is possible only when \(\det = 0\), i.e. ((65c64b17-5672-4d8f-bb56-59bc3b907725)) 1.
    • \[

      \begin{bmatrix} z & x-yi \\ x+yi & -z \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \sqrt{x-yi} \\ -i\sqrt{x+yi} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} i\sqrt{x+yi} & \sqrt{x-yi} \end{bmatrix} =: \begin{bmatrix} \xi^1 \\ \xi^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} -\xi^2 & \xi^1 \end{bmatrix}

      \]

  • When the rank is greater than 1, the matrix can be written as the sum of product of spinors.

5.3.1. Rotation

  • It is rotated by a single \(\mathrm{SU}(2)\) matrix, which is half of the rotation of the Pauli vector, that does not change the length of the spinor: \[ \lVert U\xi \rVert^2 = (U\xi)^\dagger (U\xi) = \xi^\dagger U^\dagger U\xi = \xi^\dagger \xi = \lVert \xi \rVert^2. \]
  • The spinors on the Poincaré sphere and the Bloch sphere is also rotated in the same way.

5.4. Weyl Vector

  • Using the :
    • \[ ct\sigma_t + x\sigma_x + y\sigma_y + z\sigma_z = \begin{bmatrix} ct + z & x-yi \\ x+yi & ct-z \end{bmatrix} \]
    • with \(\sigma_t\) being the identity matrix.

5.4.1. Properties

  • Hermitian matrix
  • The determinant is the spacetime interval.
  • It transforms with \(\mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{C})\) matrices.
    • The transformation matrix is special and Hermitian
    • The boosts uses the hyperbolic functions

5.5. Weyl Spinor

  • Spinor in four dimensional spacetime.

Weyl vector can be factored into Weyl spinors

\begin{bmatrix} ct + z & x-yi \\ x+yi & ct-z \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \psi^1 \\ \psi^2\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {\psi^1}^* & {\psi^2}^*\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \psi^1 \\ \psi^2\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} \psi^{\dot{1}}& \psi^{\dot{2}}\end{bmatrix}

with \(|\psi^1| = \sqrt{ct+z}, |\psi^2| = \sqrt{ct-z}\) and the phase difference \(\theta_2 - \theta_1 = \arctan(y/x)\).

5.5.1. Inner Product

  • \(\psi^\dagger \epsilon \phi\) is never conserved.
  • So \(\psi^\top \epsilon \phi\) is chosen as the inner product with
    • \[ \epsilon = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0\end{bmatrix}. \]
  • It is alternating.
  • \(\epsilon\) is called a

5.5.2. Dual Spinor

  • From the inner product

\[ \psi^\top\epsilon \]

  • The complex conjugate of a left spinor \(\psi\) becomes the right dual spinor \(\psi^*\).
  • The right spinor would be \(\psi^\dagger \epsilon\).

5.5.3. Chirality

  • It has left and right chirality, which is notated by \(\psi^a, \psi_a\) and \(\psi^{\dot{a}}, \psi_{\dot{a}}\).
  • This happens because the \(\mathrm{SO}(2,\mathbb{C})\) has two different representation, left and right. The two are connected by complex conjugation.
    • Unlike \(\mathrm{SU}(2)\), there is no invertible matrix \(P\), such that \(L^* = P^{-1}LP\).
5.5.3.1. Van der Waerden Notation
  • Placing dot above the right chiral spinor indices.

5.6. Dirac Spinor

  • The spinor in the four dimensional spacetime, that accounts for the .
  • It consists of a left chiral Weyl spinor and a right chiral Weyl spinor.

5.7. Spin Group

  • The double cover of \(\mathrm{SO}(n)\) is called the spin group \(\mathrm{Spin}(n)\).
    • It is the group of generalization of unit quaternions for \(n\)-dimensional space.
  • The double cover of \(\mathrm{SO}^+(p,q)\) is called the spin group \(\mathrm{Spin}(p,q)\).
  • The systematic construction of spin groups involves the use of .

6. Wigner Quasipropability Distribution

  • Wigner function, Wigner-Ville distribution
  • The "probability" over phase space

\[ W(x,p) := \frac{1}{\pi \hbar} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^{*}(x+y) \psi(x-y) e^{2ipy/\hbar} \dd{y} \]

Short-term Fourier transform with itself as the weight function.

7. References

Author: Jeemin Kim

Created: 2026-09-29 Tue 17:22